September 29th, 2007

New Chivas 25 yr. old debuts in NYC

John Hansell

I spent last night at the New York Public Library. It’s not what I normally do on a Friday night, but this was no ordinary night. I was invited by Pernod Ricard, along with four hundred lucky people who came from aound the world, to attend the debut of a new Chivas Regal whisky.

I don’t think we even got to taste the whisky until well after 11:00 pm. Before that, we enjoyed an excellent meal, along with being entertained by Grammy award-winning modern jazz musician Diana Krall, among others. I was joined by my friends, and fellow spirits writers, Gary Regan, Paul Pacult, and Dave Wondrich, which just made the evening even more pleasurable.

So, why all the hoopla? Well, about a century ago there was a Chivas 25 year old, but World War I and the Great Depression put an end to it. The 25 is now being re-introduced, and it debuted last night. Colin Scott, Master Blender and also a friend of mine, introduced the whisky to all of us.

Digression: My evening wasn’t all glamour. I live in Pennsylvania, and the most convenient way, from where I live, to New York City is (sadly) by bus. The plan was to get into NYC two hours early, which would allow me plenty of time to check into my hotel, change into my tux, and get to the gala on time at 7 pm. As luck would have it, my bus showed up late, and then it ran into traffic all the way from Newark through the Lincoln Tunnel. I arrive at the Port Authority Bus Terminal (a cultural experience on a normal day) at 15 minutes beore 7 pm. No time to get to the hotel, so I have no choice: change from my jeans into my tux in the Port Authority Bus Terminal men’s room and walk to the NY Public Library from there! (Just in case you think my job is nothing but glamour, try that sometime. The toilet was motion activated, so I enjoyed the sounds of constant flushing while I was getting all dolled up.)

Anyway, back to Chivas. First let me say that I have high regard for Chivas. I think that the Chivas 12 year old is a really good blended scotch. The 18 year old is one of the finest blended scotches on the market, regardless of price, for its complexity of flavor and impeccable balance. I consider it to be a benchmark whisky. (And the Chivas Brothers Royal Salute 21 year old isn’t far behind.) So, when I discovered that Chivas was coming out with a new 25 year old, I couldn’t wait to try it.

But let’s face it, it’s difficult to improve on a benchmark whisky, and 25 years is quite old for a blended scotch–there isn’t as much of a malty backbone (when compared to single malts) to balance all those years spent in oak.

I still think that the new 25 year old is a very nice whisky. It has a great nose, and the palate works for me too. But it is the finish where the whisky starts showing its age, by becoming dry, oaky, and lingering.

So, here’s what I would suggest. If you are a big Chivas fan, and you can afford the $300 splurge, get a bottle when it eventually gets in circulation and enjoy it. But, if you’re looking for the biggest bang for your buck,  the Chivas 18 year old is my pick among the Chivas portfolio. (Formal review forthcoming in the next issue of Malt Advocate magazine.)

Category: Events, Opinions, Scotch whisky No Comments

September 28th, 2007

New Diageo single malts

John Hansell

Here’s the scoop on the new Diageo single malts coming to the U.S. this fall, including the suggested retail prices. And yes, that’s not a typo. Glenkinchie 12 year old, not 10 year old. The 12 replaces the 10. I already tasted the new 12 and will provide my thoughts in the next day or two.

Rare Editions:
Talisker 30 YO- $349.99
Lagavulin 21 YO- $299.99
Brora 30 YO- $399.99
Port Ellen 28YO- $299.99
 
Distillers Editions:
Oban – $79.99
Lagavulin – $99.99
 
Glenkinchie 12 YO- $49.99

Category: New Releases, Scotch whisky No Comments

September 28th, 2007

Black Bottle Original finally in U.S.

John Hansell

It took so many years just to get Black Bottle 10 year old to the U.S., which arrived a couple of years ago. Now, for the first time, Black Bottle Original is being imported.

For those of you who don’t know, Black Bottle is a blended whisky containing malt whiskies from Islay. It combines the classic Islay phenolic peat smoke intensity with the drinkability of a blended whisky. Black Bottle Original, while lacking an age statement, is younger than Black Bottle 10 year old and, at about $24, is also less expensive. While I still prefer Black Bottle 10 over the Original, the Original is a nice whisky and a really great value.  I formally reviewed it in the upcoming issue of Malt Advocate, which just mailed.

If you’re trying to track down a bottle, contact the importer, InterbevUSA at: cust@interbevusa.com.

Category: New Releases, Reviews, Scotch whisky 1 Comment

September 27th, 2007

Wild Turkey Rye vs. WT Russell’s Reserve Rye

John Hansell

So, I received a box of two new Wild Turkey whiskeys last week. One was the new Wild Turkey American Spirit 15 year old 100 proof. The other was the new Wild Turkey Russell’s Reserve Rye 6 year old 90 proof. In the box was a note: “You’re the first person to get these. We hope you like them.” (Christmas is so anticlimactic!)

 Anyway, I tasted them over the weekend, and loved both of them. (More on the American Spirit bourbon in a later post.) I thought it would be cool to compare the new Russell’s Reserve Rye to the existing Wild Turkey Rye, so I did. (Yes, there’s already a WT Rye on the market. It is 101 proof and doesn’t have an age statement, but is at least 4 years old.)

The verdict? In short, if you want an extrordinarily smooth, extremely drinkable rye with plenty of lush sweetness for balance, go for the new Russell’s Reserve Rye. If you like your rye whiskeys more traditionally bold and feiry, with plenty of attitude, then the standard Wild Turkey Rye is for you. Price isn’t much of a factor: $20 for the WT Rye, $25 for the WT Russell’s Reserve Rye. If I had to pick one, I would pick the Russell’s Reserve Rye, for its smoothness and drinkability.

By the way, have you noticed how much smoother and easier to drink all the new Wild Turkey whiskeys are these days? A topic for another day.

Category: New Releases, Reviews, Rye whiskey No Comments

September 26th, 2007

What does John Know? enhancements

John Hansell

I have received some excellent feedback from you on my new blog, and I have responded accordingly by making the following enhancements to the site. They are:

  • Added RSS capability
  • Added search capability
  • Moved my recent postings to the right-hand column for easier viewing
  • Created a search capability by category (e.g., New Releases)
  • Created a search capability by month (e.g., September)

(Yes, we have been very busy the past few days working on this.) All this is designed to make your navigating quicker and more convenient. Thank you for your excellent suggestions!

Category: Uncategorized No Comments

September 25th, 2007

New Auchentoshan and Bowmore whiskies

John Hansell

It must be autumn, because new whiskies from keep rolling out in time for the cold weather (and holiday season). Next up: Morrison Bowmore Distillers is introducing two new Auchentoshan whiskies. The first one, from 28 bourbon barrels, is a 16 year old, cask strength, non-chillfiltered Auchentoshan. It is set to retail for $120. The second Auchentoshan is a 1965 vintage 40 year old, with a $1,500 price tag.

Not to be outdone by Auchentoshan, there’s two new Bowmore whiskies heading your way. The first is the third of a trilogy. It’s a 16 year old, port wood matured, cask strength 1991 vintage. (The previous ones being 1989 bourbon matured Bowmore and 1990 sherry cask matured Bowmore.) They’re from 26 port pipes and will retail for $100. The second one is a resurrection of the now famous Black Bowmore. It’s from the original batch that were first released over 10 years ago. This one is 42 years old and will set you back a hefty $4,000.

I am staring at samples of the Auchentoshan 16 and 40 year old, and the Bowmore 16 year old, so I’ll post my reviews as soon as I get a chance to taste them.

Breaking news:This just in from my Morrison Bowmore Distillers contact:

“I’m afraid we’ve had a production set-back involving the new single malts I sent you last week.  They were supposed to be in stores by October, and now

it looks like January 1. (Ditto with Black Bowmore,)  The whisky is ready, but there’s a delay due to the box manufacturer. ”

Looks like there will be no new Auchentoshans or Bowmores under the Christmas tree this year–unless you want to ask for a bottle of the new Bowmore 18 year old that was released earlier this year. One could do worse. Much worse.

Category: New Releases, Scotch whisky No Comments

September 25th, 2007

Review: Top 10 Rated Whiskies in the Next Issue of Malt Advocate

John Hansell

The next issue of Malt Advocate mails on October 1. Some of the items in the Buyer’s Guide are limited edition whiskies, so hopefully getting this information early will help you stay ahead of the pack.

96 The Glenlivet Cellar Collection, 1969 vintage, 50.8%, $750
It’s great that Glenlivet releases whiskies under the “Cellar Collection” label. It really shows the true potential of Glenlivet. This bottling is classic ultra-matured Glenlivet, and rivals the 1959 vintage Cellar Collection as the best one ever. An incredibly complex whisky, with notes of vanilla, ripe barley, coconut, and caramel. All this is accentuated by glazed orange, hazelnut, and a potpourri of dried spices. Not the least bit tired for such an aged whisky. (Only 800 bottles for the U.S.)

95 Highland Park, Cask #13308, 1973 vintage, 33 year old, 54.4%, $280
Dark and decadent. Notes of old pot still rum, roasted nuts, chocolate fudge, burnished leather, Dundee cake, tobacco, and a hint of damp peat. When I drink this, I feel like I’m sitting in the study of a stately Scottish mansion contemplating a fine, aged Cuban cigar. Royalty in a glass. (Bottled for Binny’s Beverage Depot)

95 Parker’s Heritage Collection, First Edition, 1996 vintage, 61.3%, $80
There are two noteworthy items regarding this whiskey. It’s the first barrel-proof whiskey released by Heaven Hill for the U.S. market. It’s also the first of what will be an ongoing series of releases under the “Parker’s Heritage Collection” label. This one is rich, with thick toffee, molasses, vanilla fudge, and Heath bar. It’s also well balanced, with underlying exotic spice, summer fruit, dusty corn, and tobacco to balance the sweeter notes. Long, soothing, finish. A nicely matured bourbon of character and pedigree.

94 Highland Park, Cask #7957, 1977 vintage, 29 year old, 48.5%, $300
A delicious, well-balanced, ultra-matured expression of Highland Park. Toffee apples, molasses, and vanilla fudge provide a sweet foundation, with evolving notes of dark chocolate, dry spicy oak, tobacco, subtle smoke, and lingering brine on the finish. Nicely done. (Bottled for Old Oaks Cigar & Wine Company)

93 Highland Park, Cask #691, 1983 vintage, 23 year old, 59.8%, $150
Very sophisticated and subtly complex. Perhaps the lightest-colored of the bunch. Fresh, appetizing brine and spice (cinnamon, vanilla, white pepper, and clove) on a bed of soft honey and creamy vanilla, with just a hint of fruit. The notes are bright, clean, and tight. Spicy, briny finish. A beautifully delicate Highland Park. (Bottled for Green’s)

93 Balvenie, Cask #17893, 1974 vintage, 52.8%, $600
The newest offering from the impressive Balvenie vintage cask line. Honey, caramel custard, and Seville orange notes, with evolving—and increasingly noticeable—dried spice, oak resin, and leather that integrates well with the sweet, fruity notes. Incredible depth and complexity. The Balvenie vintage reputation remains intact.

92 Four Roses Barrel Strength, 13 year old, 52.1%, $70
A single barrel offering to celebrate Distillery Manager Jim Rudtledge’s 40 years in the industry. Dry, botanical, and teasingly complex, with bright fruit, crisp spice, and complex oak. Its dryness is prevalent throughout—the maturity is evident—but never excessively so, and there’s always a soft interplay of honey and vanilla. A very elegant whiskey.

92 Four Roses Single Barrel, Barrel #87-6L, 50%, $40
A fuller-bodied, sweeter encounter than Barrel #55-6F reviewed below. More rounded and even-keeled throughout, too! Chewy toffee, rummy molasses, and nougat, with underlying notes of dark, berried fruit, accentuating spice, and supple leather. The heavyweight of the group.

92 Buffalo Trace Experimental Collection Zinfandel Aged Bourbon, 14 year old, 45%, $50/375 ml
Aged in Zinfandel barrels for eight years after spending six years in new charred oak. Intriguing spice (mint, cocoa, cinnamon), along with molasses, roasted nuts, and delicately textured fruit (blackberry, boysenberry). Nice interplay between the fruit, sweet notes, and dried spice which emerges on the second half of the palate.

92 Highland Park, Cask #8998, 1974 vintage, 31 year old, 45.4%, $438

Antique gold, relatively light in color compared to the rest of the Highland Parks reviewed here. Nicely rounded on the nose and palate, and surprisingly youthful for such maturity. Mouth-coating texture. Quite fruity—especially with some water—with notes of honey-drenched citrus, sultana, key lime pie, and melon. Caramel and bitter chocolate notes emerge, with the chocolate and a wisp of smoke lingering on the finish. I could drink this all day and never tire of it. (Bottled for Virginia ABC)

Category: Bourbon, Malt Advocate Mag, Reviews, Scotch whisky No Comments

Older Posts »

Malt Advocate magazine is the number one source for whisky information, education and entertainment for whisky enthusiasts.

Find out more