<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Woodford Reserve Master&#8217;s Collection &#8220;Seasoned Oak&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:55:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/#comment-12390</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2541#comment-12390</guid>
		<description>I just toured the distillery a couple of weeks ago. @Red_Arremer, @John Hansell: All the bourbon coming out of the Labrot and Graham distillery is triple distilled in their three copper stills on the premise. They do not mix with bourbon from other distilleries. Michael Shoshani is correct. The law requires that bourbon is aged in new white oak charred barrels, meaning that the barrel hasn&#039;t been used for any thing else when the grain alcohol is put in it. The wood for the barrels for this Master&#039;s Collection has just sat around a lot longer than normal before they were made into barrels.  @Levi: Red is correct again, depending on the type of batch (small, very small) they mix two or more barrels together before bringing it down to the legally required bottling proof (around 90) for flavor consistency between batches.  A barrel of bourbon can be aged from 5.5 to over 8 years (normally) before the master distiller releases it for bottling. That will give each barrel a slightly different flavor.

Thanks John for the review. I&#039;m stepping out to get my bottle now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just toured the distillery a couple of weeks ago. @Red_Arremer, @John Hansell: All the bourbon coming out of the Labrot and Graham distillery is triple distilled in their three copper stills on the premise. They do not mix with bourbon from other distilleries. Michael Shoshani is correct. The law requires that bourbon is aged in new white oak charred barrels, meaning that the barrel hasn&#8217;t been used for any thing else when the grain alcohol is put in it. The wood for the barrels for this Master&#8217;s Collection has just sat around a lot longer than normal before they were made into barrels.  @Levi: Red is correct again, depending on the type of batch (small, very small) they mix two or more barrels together before bringing it down to the legally required bottling proof (around 90) for flavor consistency between batches.  A barrel of bourbon can be aged from 5.5 to over 8 years (normally) before the master distiller releases it for bottling. That will give each barrel a slightly different flavor.</p>
<p>Thanks John for the review. I&#8217;m stepping out to get my bottle now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/#comment-12374</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2541#comment-12374</guid>
		<description>Thanks Red, for answering Levi&#039;s question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Red, for answering Levi&#8217;s question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red_Arremer</title>
		<link>http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/#comment-12369</link>
		<dc:creator>Red_Arremer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2541#comment-12369</guid>
		<description>Probably, each batch is a different bunch of barrels getting mixed together (though it&#039;s entirely possible that the contents of one barrel might end up in two different batches). The profile of the whiskey might vary a little from batch to batch, but if they are aiming for consistency it shouldn&#039;t be too huge a factor. And yes, I&#039;m sure there was a &quot;Batch #1.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably, each batch is a different bunch of barrels getting mixed together (though it&#8217;s entirely possible that the contents of one barrel might end up in two different batches). The profile of the whiskey might vary a little from batch to batch, but if they are aiming for consistency it shouldn&#8217;t be too huge a factor. And yes, I&#8217;m sure there was a &#8220;Batch #1.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanya</title>
		<link>http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/#comment-12359</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2541#comment-12359</guid>
		<description>I am looking for a place to buy this in Louisiana preferably in Baton Rouge. I am not even sure it has been distributed here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking for a place to buy this in Louisiana preferably in Baton Rouge. I am not even sure it has been distributed here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi</title>
		<link>http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/#comment-12345</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2541#comment-12345</guid>
		<description>PLEASE answer this... What is the deal with the &quot;Batches&quot; ??

I found Batch #5 of this new Masters Edition, was there a &quot;Batch #1&quot; ?

Any light you can shed on this would be VERY appreciated: levimedia@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLEASE answer this&#8230; What is the deal with the &#8220;Batches&#8221; ??</p>
<p>I found Batch #5 of this new Masters Edition, was there a &#8220;Batch #1&#8243; ?</p>
<p>Any light you can shed on this would be VERY appreciated: <a href="mailto:levimedia@gmail.com">levimedia@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/#comment-12201</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2541#comment-12201</guid>
		<description>Michael S., Thanks for answering that question. I meant to get back to this posting and answer it, but you beat me to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael S., Thanks for answering that question. I meant to get back to this posting and answer it, but you beat me to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Shoshani</title>
		<link>http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/#comment-12192</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Shoshani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2541#comment-12192</guid>
		<description>@Mr Manhattan: There should be no conflict with the law as to labeling it &#039;Bourbon&#039; despite its finishing in other barrels.  The legal requirement to be labeled &#039;Bourbon&#039; is that it must be aged for a specified amount of time (I believe two years) in new, charred oak barrels. 

ONCE THAT PERIOD ELAPSES, the whiskey can legally be called &#039;Bourbon&#039; even if it&#039;s then dumped into galvanized zinc washtubs for a decade.

There are distilleries that hold product in stainless steel tanks to prevent further aging, but these will all have aged for the required amount of time in the specified new charred oak barrels. Likewise, the bourbon we buy in the store can legally be called &#039;Bourbon&#039; even though we&#039;re actually buying it in transparent glass bottles. Its transfer to a different storage medium does not affect its status as bourbon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mr Manhattan: There should be no conflict with the law as to labeling it &#8216;Bourbon&#8217; despite its finishing in other barrels.  The legal requirement to be labeled &#8216;Bourbon&#8217; is that it must be aged for a specified amount of time (I believe two years) in new, charred oak barrels. </p>
<p>ONCE THAT PERIOD ELAPSES, the whiskey can legally be called &#8216;Bourbon&#8217; even if it&#8217;s then dumped into galvanized zinc washtubs for a decade.</p>
<p>There are distilleries that hold product in stainless steel tanks to prevent further aging, but these will all have aged for the required amount of time in the specified new charred oak barrels. Likewise, the bourbon we buy in the store can legally be called &#8216;Bourbon&#8217; even though we&#8217;re actually buying it in transparent glass bottles. Its transfer to a different storage medium does not affect its status as bourbon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason's Scotch Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/#comment-12052</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason's Scotch Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2541#comment-12052</guid>
		<description>This should be exceedingly good provided they have their past quality control issues under control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be exceedingly good provided they have their past quality control issues under control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Gaunce</title>
		<link>http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/#comment-11978</link>
		<dc:creator>William Gaunce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2541#comment-11978</guid>
		<description>All of the Masters Collection bottlings are 100% pot stilled at the Woodford Reserve Distillery.  The regular Woodford Reserve is a batching of pot-stilled bourbon and hones barrels selected by Chris Morris at the Early Times/Old Forester distillery.  The specifics of the batching are a secret.  Woodford only has three pot stills while Old Forester is produced in Louisville.  Flavor profiles of these two bourbons has become increasingly more alike as the years develop.

The wood that was aged for three and one-half to five years had time for the extra tannins to leach out into the limestone gravel that the wood sits on.  This resulted, when charred and toasted, in imparting different flavors.  These were all charred new oak barrels.  The flavor is robust at 100.4 proof.

Brown Forman makes every drop of its bourbons in its own facilities and every barrel is aged in BF warehouses.  This make them unique in the industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of the Masters Collection bottlings are 100% pot stilled at the Woodford Reserve Distillery.  The regular Woodford Reserve is a batching of pot-stilled bourbon and hones barrels selected by Chris Morris at the Early Times/Old Forester distillery.  The specifics of the batching are a secret.  Woodford only has three pot stills while Old Forester is produced in Louisville.  Flavor profiles of these two bourbons has become increasingly more alike as the years develop.</p>
<p>The wood that was aged for three and one-half to five years had time for the extra tannins to leach out into the limestone gravel that the wood sits on.  This resulted, when charred and toasted, in imparting different flavors.  These were all charred new oak barrels.  The flavor is robust at 100.4 proof.</p>
<p>Brown Forman makes every drop of its bourbons in its own facilities and every barrel is aged in BF warehouses.  This make them unique in the industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/#comment-11929</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2541#comment-11929</guid>
		<description>Being a big Woodford fan I am looking forward to this release. Interesting points being discussed regarding the use of the wood and the &quot;finish aging&quot;. Is there a question as to whether or not this is a &quot;legal&quot; bourbon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a big Woodford fan I am looking forward to this release. Interesting points being discussed regarding the use of the wood and the &#8220;finish aging&#8221;. Is there a question as to whether or not this is a &#8220;legal&#8221; bourbon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/#comment-11919</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2541#comment-11919</guid>
		<description>Red, I really enjoyed Astar. I should be getting this new WRMC release in a week or two and will let everyone know my thoughts on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red, I really enjoyed Astar. I should be getting this new WRMC release in a week or two and will let everyone know my thoughts on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red_Arremer</title>
		<link>http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/#comment-11910</link>
		<dc:creator>Red_Arremer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2541#comment-11910</guid>
		<description>Mike @6, have you tried Astar? The whole point of it is that it&#039;s a young scotch, probably 6-8 years old, that gets aged in charred new oak that has been seasoned for a very long time. It tastes relatively more mature than you&#039;d expect and is packed with vanilla notes, has barely any sappiness, and a little spice.... which makes me wonder if this bourbon will be too sweet. I guess we&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike @6, have you tried Astar? The whole point of it is that it&#8217;s a young scotch, probably 6-8 years old, that gets aged in charred new oak that has been seasoned for a very long time. It tastes relatively more mature than you&#8217;d expect and is packed with vanilla notes, has barely any sappiness, and a little spice&#8230;. which makes me wonder if this bourbon will be too sweet. I guess we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/#comment-11890</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2541#comment-11890</guid>
		<description>Michael, I believe because the second barrels are still new it should be ok. If I remember it only says new barrels it doesn&#039;t say anything about reracking it into another new barrels. I believe there is another bourbon that doers this as well (isn&#039;t it Pritchards double barrel bourbon or something close to that). Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, I believe because the second barrels are still new it should be ok. If I remember it only says new barrels it doesn&#8217;t say anything about reracking it into another new barrels. I believe there is another bourbon that doers this as well (isn&#8217;t it Pritchards double barrel bourbon or something close to that). Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Manhattan</title>
		<link>http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/#comment-11886</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Manhattan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2541#comment-11886</guid>
		<description>@David G: The press release indicates these barrels are used for &#039;finish aging&#039; - which leads me to believe two barrels are used: one for the initial period of aging and another (made from the seasoned staves) for the finishing. So the whiskey spends time in two different barrels. I&#039;m interested in understanding how that&#039;s still considered &#039;bourbon&#039; under existing standards. (And I&#039;m not impugning the product, merely trying to understand the labeling.)

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David G: The press release indicates these barrels are used for &#8216;finish aging&#8217; &#8211; which leads me to believe two barrels are used: one for the initial period of aging and another (made from the seasoned staves) for the finishing. So the whiskey spends time in two different barrels. I&#8217;m interested in understanding how that&#8217;s still considered &#8216;bourbon&#8217; under existing standards. (And I&#8217;m not impugning the product, merely trying to understand the labeling.)</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Dereszynski</title>
		<link>http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2009/10/27/new-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak/#comment-11874</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Dereszynski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2541#comment-11874</guid>
		<description>Hi John,
As usual answers produce more questions and with Woodford Reserve there always seem to be questions as to their methods,wether it be their distillation or aging process ect. ect.
My question pertains to the latest Masters Collection and the special aged wood or staves.Since the staves are aged by 3-5 years rather than months what does this in fact do? Is the rest of their proccessing of the wood,ie charring level ect. remain the same or is that also changed. I also remember Jim McEwan once saying that the thickness of the staves of a cask can effect the whisky. Did the extra aging change the thickness of the staves?
I dont expect you to have the answers, just something to ponder while you sit in your easy chair by the fire sipping  a little whisky/whiskey while you fight the flu.
SLAINTE/GOOD HEALTH!!
Mike Dski</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,<br />
As usual answers produce more questions and with Woodford Reserve there always seem to be questions as to their methods,wether it be their distillation or aging process ect. ect.<br />
My question pertains to the latest Masters Collection and the special aged wood or staves.Since the staves are aged by 3-5 years rather than months what does this in fact do? Is the rest of their proccessing of the wood,ie charring level ect. remain the same or is that also changed. I also remember Jim McEwan once saying that the thickness of the staves of a cask can effect the whisky. Did the extra aging change the thickness of the staves?<br />
I dont expect you to have the answers, just something to ponder while you sit in your easy chair by the fire sipping  a little whisky/whiskey while you fight the flu.<br />
SLAINTE/GOOD HEALTH!!<br />
Mike Dski</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
