November 30th, 2009

Don’t forget: 2 for 1 Malt Advocate subscription offer

John Hansell

I blogged about it here about a month ago.  Since many of you are new to this blog over the past month, I wanted to repeat the offer.

I am offering a “two years of Malt Advocate for the price of one” to any new subscriber. (It also makes a great gift!). Many of you have already taken us up on this offer. It’s good through December. Just follow the link above to my original post for more information.

Malt Advocate really is a great whisky magazine. And now you have a chance to get it for a great price too!  Slainte!

Category: Malt Advocate Mag, Special offers 2 Comments

November 30th, 2009

New Scotch Whisky Regulations Take Effect

John Hansell

As many of you know, new Scotch whisky regulations are now in effect. A summary of these regulations, along with a link to the actual regulations, was posted on the Scotch Whisky Association’s website. I have included it below.

Some of the requirements are significant. Do you have any thoughts or comments on these new regulations and its impact on whisky?

1. The Scotch Whisky Regulations (2009/2890) represent a definitive statement on the definition and presentation of Scotch Whisky. Full details of the new law can be found at
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/uksi_20092890_en_1.

 

2. The key provisions of the new law include:

? Five categories of Scotch Whisky are defined for the first time; Single Malt Scotch Whisky, Single Grain Scotch Whisky, Blended Malt Scotch Whisky, Blended Grain Scotch Whisky, and Blended Scotch Whisky.
? These compulsory category sales terms will be required to appear clearly and prominently on all labels.

? A requirement to only bottle Single Malt Scotch Whisky in Scotland.

? New rules to prevent the misleading labelling and marketing of Single Malt Scotch Whiskies.

? A ban on the use of the term ‘Pure Malt’.

? A ban on the use of a distillery name as a brand name on any Scotch Whisky which has not been wholly distilled in the named distillery.

? Protection of five traditional whisky regions of production; Highland, Lowland, Speyside, Islay, and Campbeltown.

? A requirement that Scotch Whisky must be wholly matured in Scotland.

? Clear rules on the use of age statements on packaging.

? Designation of HM Revenue & Customs as the verification authority for Scotch Whisky.

Category: Opinions, Regulatory issues Tags: 18 Comments

November 28th, 2009

My new Malt Advocate editorial: You spoke. I listened, and I’m spreading the word!

John Hansell

 The new issue of Malt Advocate just mailed. Over this past year, I listened to your concerns and gripes, summarized them, and wrote them up in my “From the Publisher” column. You DO have an impact. Don’t ever forget it!

For those of you who still are not subscribing (don’t forget that I offered my “two for one” deal here recently), I have included my column below.

—————————

You’re Mad as Hell…

 

It’s the perfect storm for whisky. A full-throttle whisky boom that’s decimating the worldwide whisky stocks confronts the nastiest global recession in our lifetime—head on!

The aftermath? Skyrocketing whisky prices at a time when whisky enthusiasts can least afford it.

The bloodshed is splattered all over my blog, What Does John Know? (http:/blog.maltadvocate.com) with pages of gripes and frustration. Sure, escalating whisky prices got their share of the ire. But there’s more.

The best whisky you’ll never have…
There’s nothing like reading about a whisky you can’t buy and you’ll never see (outside of pictures on whisky companies’ websites and whisky blogs, that is) to get your whisky-deprived blood to boil. It’s happening a lot these days. Caveats like “Travel Retail Only” and “Committee Members Only” are appearing a lot these days in press release. Sure, it’s nice to have access to a really nice whisky when you’re traveling overseas, but the majority of us aren’t traveling anywhere except to our local retailer.

And the only committee we’re a member of is the one our boss volunteered us for at work (assuming you’re lucky enough to still have a boss).

Then there’s the issue of bottle size and labeling approval. The U.S. bottles at 750 ml, while the rest of the world bottles at 700 ml, and label approvals (and associated fees) are required for individual states in the U.S.

The consequence? Many whisky companies outside the U.S.—especially those with smaller production runs—won’t even bother exporting their whiskies to the U.S. They’ll just stick to 700 ml bottles. In case you’re thinking about it, don’t even try to buy one of those bottles from an overseas retailer and have them ship the bottle to you here in the U.S. Our Customs officials will stop those shipments at the border.

Even if a limited-edition whisky does find its way to the U.S, if you live outside of a major city, good luck finding a bottle. You better start scouring the internet for retailers in big cities and become good friends with the spirits manager at one of the stores lucky enough to get a few bottles.

…And can’t afford
Dalmore “Sirius” will only cost you about $16,000. The new Macallan Lalique 57 is listed at $15,000. Gold Bowmore will set you back a mere $6,250. That makes the new Highland Park 1968 Vintage look like a steal at $3,700!

Sure, there will always be “trophy” whiskies on the market like these that only Wall Street executives can afford. As long as the whiskies that we commoners buy stay reasonable, right?

Well, unless you just started drinking whisky last week (poor soul); you know that prices, across the board, have far outpaced inflation over the past several years—and much more than your salary increases. In fact, prices have gone up so much lately, I’m struggling to determine what a whisky “value” is anymore.

…and may never even know about
Is it that whisky companies are so busy with bottling, labeling, distribution, and calculating their profit margins that they neglect telling us about the whisky they are trying to sell?

In all fairness, some companies do a great job of informing—and educating—their sales staff, press, retailers and consumers about what’s inside the bottle, what it tastes like, and where you can buy a bottle. Still, I still think it’s the minority of producers, not the majority.

The more a whisky company can tell us about their whisky, the greater the chance that we’ll buy one we like, which will increase their sales. Hello out there whisky industry! Are you listening?

…or is adulterated
Why make a whisky taste worse or blander just so it looks pretty? Drinking the whisky the primary objective? So why chill-filter it (stripping out flavor) just so it doesn’t get a little hazy when you add ice cubes or cold water? Why pollute it with caramel coloring just so every bottle looks identical? Fine leather, hand-crafted woodwork, and even my favorite hand-rolled cigars all vary in color and texture. That’s part of the charm. It’s not a disease!

…with marketing-driven names instead of age statements
At the same time prices are going up, many companies are dropping their age statements and giving the whisky (sometimes thoughtful, sometimes quite silly) names instead. Why?

One reason is to cover for gaps in production. For example, during difficult economic times (like the 1980s), many distilleries cut back on production or stopped altogether.

Another reason is to blend in the young new whiskies that are coming on the market with older stocks. Selling a three year old obviously has its risks, given that it probably isn’t fully mature yet. Blending it in with some older whiskies can breathe life into an older whisky if done properly. But, they’re not going to put a 3 year old label on a whisky that has a lot of 10 or 15 or even 20 year old whisky in it, are they?

So, there’s much to be frustrated about. Hopefully this is just a phase. It probably is, as a brief look at history will suggest.

Looking for the silver lining in this cloud, there are still a few things to be grateful for. Selection is better than it’s ever been, and I honestly feel that the overall quality of whisky is the best it’s ever been.

 So be patient. Savor what you have. Look for the bargains. Most importantly, realize that you are more powerful than you think. Ultimately, whisky companies will listen to your pleas—and your purchases—and adapt. That is, the successful ones will.

Category: Malt Advocate Mag, Opinions 32 Comments

November 28th, 2009

Review: three Islay Mist blended Scotch whiskies

John Hansell

An Islay whisky-based blend seems very logical. You get the flavors and intensity of an Islay whisky, but with the drinkability of a blended whisky. A good starting point for those wanting to ease their way into Islay whiskies.

Islay Mist, 8 year old, 40%, $24
The nice thing about Islay whiskies is that they often show their true nature better at a younger age. Malty sweet and incredibly herbal (almost gin-like), with emerging tar, smoked seaweed, and olive. Medicinal in nature, with lingering tar and brine on the finish. Fairly straight-forward (What do you expect for 8 years old?) but a pretty decent showing for a whisky this young.

Malt Advocate magazine rating: 79

Islay Mist, 12 year old, 40%, $50
More rounded, with greater depth when compared to the 8 year old offering. Not as medicinal and less sweet, more toffee and less honey, with more dried spice interwoven throughout. The herbs are still there, along with licorice root. Dry, burning ember finish. Nicely balanced too, which makes it my favorite of the three whiskies.

Malt Advocate magazine rating: 86

Islay Mist, 17 year old, 40%, $80
Deeper, darker in personality when compared to its younger siblings, but with the same personality. Drier too—especially on the finish, with added oak resin, espresso, leather and tobacco. Bonus points for character.

Malt Advocate magazine rating: 84

Category: Reviews, Scotch whisky 7 Comments

November 27th, 2009

Report: “U.S. wineries must adjust to a $50 ceiling.” Is whisky to follow?

John Hansell

Decanter magazine reports here about a new study which shows the effect of the current recession on wine prices. One quote from the report says:

Wineries need to adjust to a ‘new normal’ of reduced spending power – among the very consumers who have driven recent growth in the market. For that segment of Baby Boomers who have seen their net worth drastically reduced and who have been the prime target of wine marketing for nearly 20 years, a US$50 bottle of wine is now permanently out of the question for a normal purchase.

It goes on to advise:

wineries to focus more of their marketing on the under-40s, pointing out that those aged 45-54 have seen their net worth fall by 45% over the past five years.

So, this leads me to wonder if the whisky companies will take the same approach to the products they produce and sell. Will we start seeing more lower-priced whiskies on the market? Will they ramp up their marketing efforts to a younger crowd who supposedly haven’t seen their net worth fall so much?

Or is the whisky industry more immune to the recession?

Your thoughts?

Category: Media, Opinions, Wine 18 Comments

November 26th, 2009

Happy Thanksgiving everyone!

John Hansell

It is Thanksgiving here in the U.S.. I really do have so much to be thankful for. This includes all of you who take time out of your busy schedule to join in here and participate.

I want to take time out of my Thanksgiving festivities to say that we have a good thing going here, and it’s because of you. Thank you!

Category: Events, Opinions 3 Comments

November 24th, 2009

Pairing whisky and cigars

John Hansell

Tonight I’m going to Cigar Aficionado’s “Big Smoke.” It’s the cigar equivalent of a WhiskyFest. In fact, Big Smoke is held in the same room as WhiskyFest New York at the Marriott Marquis on Times Square in New York City. (We comp them a couple tickets to WhiskyFest and they do the same for us with the Big Smoke.)

I know that some of you would never even think of smoking a cigar, let alone smoking one while enjoying a whisky. But, for over 25 years, I have enjoyed an occasional cigar–and something good to drink with it.

Sometimes I’ll have rich, malty full-bodied beer to go with my cigar. Other times, I’ll have a nice vintage port wine. But many times I’ll enjoy a whisky with my cigar.

I don’t have a specific pairing, but I generally DON’T drink smoky whiskies with cigars, because cigars are already smoky. Rather, I look for something to complement my cigar–like a rich sherried Speysider or full-bodied bourbon.

For those of you who enjoy a cigar with your whisky (or whiskey), do you have a favorite pairing? If so, tell us what it is.

Category: Beer, Bourbon, Cigars, Events, Scotch whisky Tags: 29 Comments

Older Posts »

Malt Advocate magazine is the number one source for whisky information, education and entertainment for whisky enthusiasts.

Find out more